A foundation statue of Shulgi, the king of Ur, the king of Sumer and Akkad.
The above image is an enlargement of the picture on the left, with some resultant loss of image quality due to the added magnification.
This small picture of the statue is the only one I had.
Even at such a small scale, something about this face
immediately caught my attention.
I was looking at this picture of the two foundation statues
of Shulgi. I instantly knew it was him, even before I read the caption. I've
done a lot of research into Shulgi, so I know what he looks like. I can
recognize his statues at a glance, so I’m something of an expert on the subject
(a self-professed expert, admittedly, and probably the only one in the world). I
had already developed a general idea of Shulgi’s appearance based on his many statues. I can also distinguish between Shulgi’s statues and those
of his father, Ur-Namma. They look very similar, but not the same. There are a few
subtle differences between them.
Shulgi
The figure on the left is very crude, typical of most foundation
statues throughout most of Sumerian history. The entire statue is about 12
inches tall, so the face is about an inch high. It’s very difficult to model the facial
features on such a small scale, so the artist sculpted just a few lines to create a
rough impression of the eyes, ears, nose, and mouth.
Although crude, even primitive, this statue is correct in all
of its essential details. Shulgi had a round face and a bulbous nose. He also had
a down turned mouth and heavy-lidded eyes that were asymmetrical.
When I looked at the statue on the right…
I was looking across 4,000 years of history, staring into the face of a living man who was
staring back at me.
I had been looking for this man for quite some time.
It all started in 2010, when I recognized Ur-Namma in the
Met Museum.
Ur-Namma. The king of Ur, the king of Sumer and Akkad, and the
father of Shulgi.
Ur-Namma's most noticeable features were his eyes. Not only were they heavy-lidded, they were also asymmetric. His drooping eyelid was the result of the hereditary
condition known as “congenital ptosis.” It is present at birth and it doesn’t
affect the vision.
All of Ur-Namma’s foundation statues portray the asymmetry
of his eyes.
Before Ur-Namma, a foundation statue had a simple and generic depiction of a man's face. It wasn't a recognizable
portrait of the king as a distinct individual. Ur-Namma was the first king with foundation statues that actually looked like him, the way he looked in real life. Despite his unusual demeanor, or because of it, Ur-Namma created recognizable
statues that deliberately portrayed the asymmetry of his eyes. A drooping eyelid is not a kingly look, but Ur-Namma was not embarrassed by it.
Since congenital ptosis is a hereditary condition, Ur-Namma transmitted
it to his son.
All Shulgi foundation statues portray his asymmetric eyes.
They
also portray his rounded face and his prominent nose.
Most of the Shulgi foundation statues convey his basic facial
features, but many of them are really quite crude, almost comical.
This is somewhat surprising, considering the fact that an artistic renaissance
occurred during his reign. I expected better quality in the statues of Shulgi.
I thought they should have more artistic merit.
Six years ago, when I discovered the realistic statue of Ur-Namma, I immediately guessed that his son had also made a realistic portrait of himself. It seemed almost inevitable, given Shulgi’s vanity and his artistic nature. I was certain that somewhere out there a realistic portrait of Shulgi was waiting to be discovered.
Realistic human portraiture was a recent development in
Sumer (and in the world). It began during the reign of Gudea.
[Click on any of the next three images to access their
web pages]
Gudea.
This is
the first realistic portrait of any human being in all of history.
Ur-Ningirsu, the
son of Gudea, also had a realistic portrait of himself.
Ur-Namma, the
father of Shulgi, continued the tradition.
So where was Shulgi?
Unfortunately, very few statues of Shulgi survived the
ravages of time. All of them are heavily damaged. None of them have a face.
I knew a realistic statue of Shulgi was out there somewhere. I kept hoping it would soon be discovered,
but I had my doubts. Archaeological expeditions to Iraq were suspended due to the constant
warfare in the region, so I had little confidence that the statue would be discovered during my lifetime.
Little did I know, the statue had already been found.
Nippur, circa 1956 (AD).
After 4,000 years, a Shulgi statue emerges from its
foundation box into the light of day.
Meanwhile I was scouring the Internet, trying to find a Shulgi
statue in a museum collection. I was hoping it was mislabeled and overlooked, like the statues of other Sumerian kings that I had already identified. Finding Shulgi was always at the back of my mind. Even when
I was researching other subjects, I kept looking for Shulgi.
The statue pictured below is a simple and
abstract portrayal of Shulgi’s facial features. Trying to find the real Shulgi based on this statue was like trying to find a real person based on a crude composite
sketch.
I was looking for a man who looked something like this.
He had a round face, a bulbous
nose, and a mouth turned down at the corners. His eyes were heavy-lidded
and asymmetrical. I was looking for...
Shulgi.
The face of Shulgi. It is photographic in its realism. This is exactly how Shulgi looked when
he was a living man and a reigning king.
This is not a prettified portrait. The statue is uncompromising
in it realism. Like Ur-Namma, Shulgi preferred to show his real appearance,
without idealization, and without the ancient version of Photoshop, as it were.
He didn’t make his asymmetric eyes more even to minimize his ptosis and make
him seem more regal. He didn’t reduce the size of his nose to make himself more
handsome. Then again, Shulgi didn’t need to look like everyone else. His face was not conventionally handsome, but it was strong and charismatic.
Once you’ve seen this statue, you know exactly what Shulgi
looks like. Not “kinda, sorta,” but exactly. You would instantly recognize him
if you met him on a city street, even if he was wearing a suit and tie.
Perhaps you have already met somebody who looks like
this. I know I have. In a way, it could be said that Shulgi is a “type.” But
even in a room full of similar men, Shulgi would be instantly recognizable by
his asymmetric eyes.
The
first time I added magnification to this picture, it startled me. It was like seeing a ghost:
The blurry spectral image set on a dark background; the eerie
lighting, the tattered diaphanous robe streaming in the light; it was like the
photograph of a ghost; the ghost of a king. It's as if the spirit of Shulgi, who was
buried 4,000 years ago, transmitted as a holographic image on my computer, appearing once again exactly as he appeared
in life, in all of his power and glory. I swear, if a bright light had burst forth from my computer and Shulgi himself appeared before me, I wouldn’t have been a bit surprised. Now I
knew why he was staring at me so intently from that small little photograph. He had willed himself into the modern world.
In a real sense, that’s precisely what he did when
he made this bronze portrait of himself in the 20th
century BC. He guaranteed that he would still be around in the 20th
century AD, and beyond. With this statue, he made himself immortal.
I love these old photographs of Shulgi (courtesy of the Oriental
Institute of the University of Chicago), but hopefully some better high-resolution photos will soon become available. When they are published, I'll be sure to post them.
In the meantime...
This is the actual size of the statue, based on my estimate
that it was 9 inches tall (see the entire statue). It required incredible skill and artistry to create this statue. Imagine trying to model a photo-realistic face on
such a small scale. This is by far the best foundation statue ever created. It
is in a class of its own. You've seen many foundation statues on this page, so you already know that nothing else compares to it.
Shulgi himself did not sit for this portrait. A king didn't have a lot of time to sit around posing for
every little statue. Nor did the artist first attempt a realistic portrait on such a small scale. It's much easier to accurately model a life-size statue, then scale it down. Shulgi posed for a life-size portrait, and this statue is a scaled down version of it. Given the detail and precision of the statue, I believe it was created by the same
artist who created the life-sized version. The artist clearly knew every crease and contour of Shulgi's face.
So ...
Somewhere out there is a life-size, realistic portrait of
Shulgi, just like the realistic statue of his father Ur-Namma. This would be the
Holy Grail of Sumerology.
The
{d} is dingir, representing divinity. It means Shulgi was worshiped as a god
during his lifetime.
I will soon add a biography of Shulgi to this website. For
now, here is a brief introduction:
Shulgi was an intellectual. He was an accomplished writer and a talented musician. He spoke several languages. The arts blossomed during his reign. Shulgi was a “renaissance
man,” long before the term was even invented.
He was a powerful athlete and a marathon runner. He hunted lions for sport.
He was also a warrior, a priest, a king, and a living god.
He ruled for 48 years when Sumerian civilization was at
its peak, at its absolute pinnacle. He was the greatest king of Sumer, where
there wasn’t any shortage of great kings. In the long history of the world, he
was one of the greatest kings who ever ruled. He should be just as famous as Caesar and Alexander. Even they would be in awe of his achievements. He lived almost two millennia before they were born, so even they would consider him to be impossibly ancient.
Now he suddenly appears in the modern world, looking exactly as he did 4,000 years ago, when he was a living man and a reigning king, at the peak of his power and glory.